Technology Corner
WTVN Radio • Columbus, Ohio • Sunday morning from 8 until 9
HomePrevious page
Who's in the corner?

Is this information useful? If so, consider
making a contribution, please.

If you use pop-up blocking software, this site will not work properly.
 
December 12, 2004

Random thought:

Dividing line

Using e-mail for marketing

No, we're not talking about spam here. There are legitimate uses for commercial e-mail. The weekly Technology Corner update is "commercial e-mail" but it's sent only to people who have requested it. High Impact E-Mail Professional makes it possible for anyone to send eye catching messages.

When I started using High Impact E-Mail Professional to send the Technology Corner summaries a couple of weeks ago, the responses were interesting. About 80% of those who had strong enough feelings that they wanted to comment on the new format liked it. People seem generally more likely to respond when they don't like something, so the true like/dislike breakdown is probably greater than 80/20.

If you don't like HTML e-mail, I can sympathize. I, too, one felt that e-mail should be plain text. I don't have that feeling today because the vast majority of e-mail programs understand how to deal with HTML e-mail. And using HTML e-mail allows me to format the message so that it's more readable. That, in fact, is the feedback I received from those who liked the new format -- it's easier to read, easier to follow, clearer. That's the whole point of communication, isn't it?

Every response from those who didn't like it said, in one way or another, "I don't like HTML e-mail" without specifying what's wrong with HTML e-mail. I used to be an anti-HTML e-mail person myself because the original HTML spec didn't provide for HTML e-mail. That may be because HTML hadn't been invented yet. Early e-mail programs didn't handle HTML very well, either. Most do now.

Those who say HTML e-mail is wrong because the original spec didn't provide for it might be compared to people who say that power steering or power brakes are wrong because the original Model-T didn't have them. And I say that as one who opposed HTML e-mail for several years. If I have to choose, I'll choose "easier to read" and "clearer" over "I don't like it just because I don't like it" every time. Making something easy to read and clear is my goal.

If there was ever a battle here, it's been "lost" by the proponents of "pure" plain-text e-mail. Yes, HTML e-mail is larger than plain text e-mail, but more than 50% of Internet users in the United States now have broadband access. Yes, HTML is not part of the original e-mail spec, but the e-mail applications used by more than 95% of e-mail users support HTML formatting.

How it works

The application comes with lots of templates and you can create your own, as I did for Technology Corner (but I used one of their templates as a starting point.) You'll need to store any images you want to use on their server.

There are at least two reasons why this is the best way to send HTML e-mail that has graphics.

  1. Placing the graphic on a server and referencing it from within the e-mail message keeps the e-mail smaller.
  2. Referencing a server-based graphic means your HTML message doesn't have an image attachment that might trigger some anti-spam software. Attachments also can cause some people to delete the message without looking because of concerns about viruses and worms.

In addition to the $100 professional version, there's a $50 standard version that includes fewer templates and doesn't include features such as mail merge and personalization within the messages.

High Impact E-mail is easy to use and, when you're ready to send a message, it opens Outlook, Outlook Express, or ACT (those are the only supported e-mail clients). The only problems I've encountered involve formatting. When I delete text and type new text, sometimes it's in the wrong format. The easy workaround is to select all the text to be deleted except the first and last characters, type the new text, and then delete the first and last characters.

Technology corner rating for HIGH IMPACT E-MAIL PROFESSIONAL

EIGHT CATS: If High Impact E-mail Professional worked with more e-mail clients and a few minor problems were eliminated, this application would get a solid 10 cats. As it is, this is still possibly the easiest way to send formatted messages that appeal to the eye.
For more information, visit the Template Zone website, where you can also download a trial version of the software.

How the Technology Corner rating system works.

Look at all the cameras

Film is dead and has been for several years, but some folks don't want to accept that fact. Kodak, Fuji, Agfa, and the other film manufacturers will continue making film for the foreseeable future, but eventually film will have the same importance as glass plates have today in the photographic world -- used mainly by students and artists who want to experiment with old methods.

That's not to say that digital photography is perfect. The cameras are still too expensive, although you'll make up that cost in not having to buy or develop film. The files, if you want a high-quality enlargement, are still huge, but disk drives are inexpensive. A digital camera doesn't act like a film camera (unless you're used to shooting slide film), but learning the new techniques is something the average person can master in a day or two -- particularly considering digital's immediate feedback.

The main problem with digital photography turns out to be a human failing: Backup. Once you've downloaded the images to your computer, they're still not safe. Creating additional copies on CDs is a good idea and high-quality CDs should last 50 years or more, assuming there are still CD readers 50 years from now. If you think this is a silly concern, see if you can find an 8-track music player, a disk reader for 8-inch floppy disks, or a working quarter-inch stereo reel-to-reel tape deck. The media often lasts longer than the technology. But let's assume there will be a way for your great-great-grandchildren to read these CDs and DVDs we're using to store photos because there probably will be and the images will be able to be transferred to the media that's current in 2054.

What will they find? Thousands of files with names like "DSC_2315.JPG". The EXIF data that's embedded in the file will tell them all about the photo technically:

File: - D:\DIGITAL CAMERAS\2003-09-Misc-ND100\DSC_2315.JPG
ImageDescription -
Make - NIKON CORPORATION
Model - NIKON D100
XResolution - 300
YResolution - 300
ResolutionUnit - Inch
Software - Ver.2.00
DateTime - 2003:09:03 21:49:36
YCbCrPositioning - Co-Sited
ExifOffset - 252
ExposureTime - 1/30 seconds
FNumber - 4.50
ExposureProgram - Shutter priority
ExifVersion - 0220
DateTimeOriginal - 2003:09:03 21:49:36
DateTimeDigitized - 2003:09:03 21:49:36
ComponentsConfiguration - YCbCr
CompressedBitsPerPixel - 4 (bits/pixel)
ExposureBiasValue - 0.00
MaxApertureValue - F 4.44
MeteringMode - Multi-segment
LightSource - Auto
Flash - Strobe return light detected
FocalLength - 85.00 mm
SubsecTime - 925892608
SubsecTimeOriginal - 925892608
SubsecTimeDigitized - 925892608
FlashPixVersion - 0100
ColorSpace - Uncalibrated
ExifImageWidth - 3008
ExifImageHeight - 2000
InteroperabilityOffset - 28174
SensingMethod - One-chip color area sensor
ExposureMode - Auto
WhiteBalance - Auto
DigitalZoomRatio - 1 x
FocalLengthIn35mmFilm - 127 mm
SceneCaptureType - Standard
GainControl - None
Contrast - Normal
Saturation - Normal
Sharpness - Normal
SubjectDistanceRange - Unknown
Maker Note (Vendor): -
Data version - 0200 (808595504)
ISO Setting - 200
Quality - FINE
White Balance - AUTO
Image Sharpening - AUTO
Focus Mode - AF-S
Flash Setting - NORMAL
White Balance Adjustment - 0
AF Focus Position - 1
Flash Type - SPEEDLIGHT
Noise Reduction - OFF
 

While all of that information is useful, it doesn't tell you want the person who's looking at the image in 2054 will want to know. They'll look at the picture ...

... and wonder "Who was that cat?" If you've had prints made from the digital image, maybe you'll have written the cat's name on the back of it, so they'll know it's Jeremiah Cheeseburger.

There are solutions to this problem. Many applications such as Thumbs Plus, Irfan View, Photoshop, and the like will allow you to add comments to the image.

If this isn't possible, and even if it is, I think it's a good idea to carefully name directories. The picture of Cheese is in a directory called "D:\DIGITAL CAMERAS\2003-09-Misc-ND100\" so I know the image was made in September of 2003 with a Nikon D100 camera.

But beyond that, why not include a text file in each directory with a quick description of what what happening and who's present? If you do this each time you download images to the computer, it won't be a daunting task. Each image doesn't need to be described. All that's needed is something like this:

These are pictures from the family vacation in 2004 when we traveled to West Mudsock, Idaho. The entire family is in picture DSC_2315.JPG. That's Elmo on the left. Francesca is standing next to him. Then Josephine, Elvira, and Fred.

That's enough information for someone to identify the people in other pictures. You might also want to add comments about the subject of the pictures, too. West Mudsock, Idaho, may be a prime vacation spot today because of the remarkable collection of muddy socks in the West Mudsock Muddy Sock Museum, but that might not always be the case.

But we're supposed to be looking at cameras

If you've decided that this is the year to go digital, you've picked a good year. If you want to spend $100 for a digital camera, you can. Don't expect to get a lot, but it will be a digital camera. If you want to spend $6,000, you can do that, too. And if you'd like to spend $40,000 on a digital camera ... yep, you can do that.

Economy cameras

The low end is in the $100 to $300 range. Theses cameras will be 2 megapixel to 4 megapixel models. Few, if any will have optical zoom and “digital zoom” is a lie. All of these cameras will be “rangefinder” view models, meaning that you don't look through the lens that will take the picture. They will be slow to operate, offer few additional features, and come with a 16MB or smaller storage card.

Examples:

  • Kodak EasyShare CX7300, 3.2 Megapixel, 3x Digital Zoom - $100
  • Olympus Camedia D-395, 3.2 Megapixel, 2.5x Digital Zoom $120
  • Pentax Optio30, 3.2 Megapixel, 3x Optical/4x Digital Zoom $160
  • Fujifilm FinePix A340, 4.0 Megapixel, 3x Optical/1.7x Digital Zoom $200
  • Nikon Coolpix 3200, 3.2 Megapixel, 3x Optical/ 4x Digital Zoom $200
  • Hewlett-Packard Photosmart R607, 4.0 Megapixel, 3x Optical/7x Digital Zoom $250
  • Sony Mavica MVC-FD200, 2.1 Megapixel, 3x Optical/6x Digital Zoom $290

Advanced cameras

For $300 to $600, you'll get a 4 megapixel to 6 megapixel camera with 3x to 5x optical zoom. Some Olympus cameras offer 10x optical zoom. These cameras will operate a bit faster and will offer options such as the ability to record short videos. They often offer various flash modes and focus modes, Expect a 16MB storage card.

Examples:

  • Nikon Coolpix 4200, 4.0 megapixel 3x Optical/4x Digital Zoom $350
  • Kodak EasyShare LS753, 5.0 Megapixel, 2.8x Optical/3.6x Digital Zoom $350
  • Nikon Coolpix 5200, 5.1 Megapixel, 3x Optical/4x Digital Zoom $400
  • Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ10K, 4.0 Megapixel, 12x Optical/3x Digital Zoom, SLR $400
  • Fujifilm FinePix S5100, 4.0 Megapixel, 10x Optical/3.6x Digital Zoom $415
  • Kodak EasyShare DX7590, 5.0 Megapixel. 10x Optical/3x Digital Zoom $500

“Prosumer” cameras

These are cameras that appeal to advanced amateurs and pros who are on a budget. Expect to pay $600 to $1500 for a 5 megapixel to 8 megapixel camera with 3x to 5x optical zoom (some 10x). These will be SLR-like cameras, meaning you will look through the lens that takes the picture. Some will have removable lenses. Expect an external flash connection that's capable of working with studio flash units, full manual and automatic focus, a 32MB storage card. These cameras will operate quickly and will have little or no “digital delay”.

Examples:

  • Sony Cybershot DSC-V3 Pro, 7.2 Megapixel, 4x Optical/2x Digital Zoom $610
  • Nikon Coolpix 8700, 8.0 Megapixel, 8x Optical/4x Digital Zoom $800
  • Olympus Camedia C-8080 Wide Zoom, 8.0 Megapixel, 5x Optical/3x Digtial Zoom $700
  • Fujifilm FinePix S20 Pro, 6.2 Megapixel, 6x Optical/2.2x Digital Zoom, SLR $700
  • Konica Minolta DiMAGE A2, 8.0 Megapixel, 7x Optical/2x Digital Zoom, SLR $720
  • Sony Cybershot DSC-F828, 8.0 Megapixel, 7x Optical /2x Digital Zoom, SLR $900
  • Panasonic Lumix DMC-LC1, 5.0 Megapixel, 3.2x Optical/3x Digital Zoom $1600
  • Canon EOS Digital Rebel (a.k.a. 300D), 6.3 Megapixel, SLR $865
  • Pentax *ist DS, 6.1 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $900
  • *ist DS Digital Camera (Camera Body) $900
  • Nikon D70, 6.1 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $1000
  • Olympus E-1, 5.0 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $1100

Professional cameras

There is some overlap with the prosumer models. These are cameras in the $1000 to $4500 range and will be in the same 5 megapixel to 8 megapixel range as the prosumer models, although some give preference to additional color depth over pixels. A few will have 3x optical zoom; most will come without a lens. These will be SLR cameras with removable lenses, external flash connections, manual and automatic flash, and manual and automatic focus. They probably will not include a storage card. The camera will have a buffer for rapid shooting and there will be no delay when you press the shutter release.

Examples:

  • Sigma Sigma SD10, 3.4 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Foveon X3 Pro) (Camera Body) $1350
  • Nikon D-100, 6.1 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $1500
  • Canon EOS 20D, 8.2 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $1500
  • Fujifilm FinePix S3 Pro, 6.0 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $2500
  • Nikon D2h Pro, 4.1 Megapixel, High Speed, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $3200
  • Nikon D1x, 5.47 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $3900
  • Canon EOS-1D Mark II, 8.2 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $4500
  • Kodak DCS Pro SLR/n, 13.8 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $5000
  • Canon EOS-1Ds, 11.1 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $6000
  • Canon EOS 1DS Mark II, 16.7 Megapixel, SLR, Digital Camera (Camera Body) $8000

Don’t even ask what these cost

Well, go ahead. Digital backs cost $10,000 to $16,000 (plus camera) and make images that are typically in the 14 megapixel to 16 megapixel range. You'll spend another $10,000 to $30,000 to buy the camera that the digital back attaches to. Some of these are fast (several images per second) and others are slow (one image every 30 seconds). There will be no storage card, but there probably will be a firewire cable to connect the digital back to your computer.

Examples:

  • Hasselblad Ixpress V96C, 16 Megapixel, Digital Camera Back for Hasselblad 500 Series Cameras $9800
  • Mega-Vision S3 Pro Digital Back for various cameras $16,000

Prices provided by B&H Photo and Video (NYC).

Information on your disk drive

Normally, when I mention disk drives, it's as part of a reminder of the importance of backing up the drive so that you don't lose the information in the event of a problem. But what if you don't want the data and you don't want anyone else to have it, either?

A listener asked: Is everything, and I do mean everything, stored on the hard drive forever? I've been afraid to start a journal on my computer for fear that someday, someone might pick up my drive out of a trash can and read absolutely everything I've ever done. I know that there are erasers for your files, delete cookies, and track erasers, and even after wiping the hard drive clean, can't experts go back and look for stuff (as in the case of criminals, where they've found incriminating evidence on the computers used by them)?

Great question! It looks at data from the other side -- secure destruction.

The information is stored on the drive until the drive breaks or until you delete it.

If the drive breaks, data might still be recoverable. There are data salvage companies that specialize in getting information back from failed disks that people didn't back up.

If you delete the file, it's not really gone. The operating system marks the file as deleted, so that it no longer shows up in the directory. But all the information is still there. Getting it back is quite easy.

There are utility programs that provide a secure erase function. These mark the file as deleted and then write over the data on the disk once or several times with various patterns of data. Imagine writing a phone number on a piece of paper and then scribbling over it with several pens held at various angles. Now it's difficult to get the data back, but not impossible.

When the military removes disk drives with sensitive data from service, the disk is physically destroyed.

For most of us, one of the secure erase utilities is sufficient. Example: Executive Software's Diskkeeper.

Oh, and after you've removed the data from the disk (or destroyed the disk) it's still on your backup tape, backup CD, backup DVD, or any other media you've used for secure retention. In some cases, people have been tripped up by data that's on a backup device or a network server.

Nerdly News

Buying wine on the Internet

If you move from California to Ohio and you'd like to serve your favorite wine from a small vineyard near Napa, but that vineyard doesn't have a distributor in Ohio, tough luck! The Internet makes it possible for small wineries to sell direct to customers, but many states have laws that make it illegal. The Supreme Court is considering the case. Laws prohibiting such sales are unconstitutional and should be upended, lawyers for a coalition of winemakers and consumers told the high court's justices.

The case concerns laws in only two states, Michigan and New York, where laws allow in-state wineries to ship wine to residents but bar shipments from wineries outside the state. Depending on how the Supreme Court rules, this battle could have a huge impact on how alcoholic beverages are sold in the US.

The court will be considering the 21st Amendment, which turns over to states the regulation of alcohol sales and how that works with federal regulations that prohibits states from restricting interstate commerce or discriminating against out-of-state businesses.

Goodbye IBM PC

A couple of decades ago, IBM sold its Selectric typewriter division and jumped in to the growing PC market. Now the company has sold a major stake in its PC business to a manufacturer in China. Some in the industry are comparing this to RCA's decision to stop making televisions. RCA more or less invented television, but sold the business to France's Thompson company. IBM didn't exactly invent the personal computer, but IBM's entry into the market made it possible for business owners to justify buying the devices.

What's next? Imagine this: Hewlett Packard could get out of the PC business within a few years. What about Dell? Dell has the notebook market, but low margins on desktop machines could mean that even Dell gets out of that part of the business.

China's Lenovo is paying a lot of money for a business unit that's not making any money, but IBM's built-in-China computers will have a price advantage. Oh, and by the way -- Apple's Powerbooks are built in China, too.

If you look at Europe, the top selling computer brand is not a US brand. It's Acer. Acer is an Italian company.

Let us know what you think about this program! Write to:
Bill Blinn --
(wtvn@blinn.com still works)
Joe Bradley --

Photo of Joe by Sally
Joe
(Photo by Sally)
Photo of Bill by Scampi
Bill
(Photo by Scampi)
TechByter Update weekly by e-mail:  
Enter your email to join Tech Corner today.
Hosted By Your Mailing List Provider

Privacy Guarantee:

I HATE SPAM and will not sell, rent, loan, auction, trade, or do anything else with your e-mail address. Period.

 

This is the only ad you'll ever see on this site. It's for my website host, BlueHost in Orem, Utah. Over the past several years, they have proven to be honest, reliable, and progressive. If you need to host a website, please click the banner below to see what BlueHost has to offer.
BlueHost
TechByter Worldwide receives a small advertising payment for each new client that signs up with BlueHost but I would make the same recommendation even if the affiliate program didn't exist. (If you don't see a banner ad above and you would like to know more, this link takes you to BlueHost.)

As if you didn't already get enough weather on the radio!
Click for Port Columbus International, Ohio Forecast
If you do not see a Weather Underground banner above and you use ad-blocking software, please set your application to allow images from "www.wunderground.com" to appear.

Annoying legal disclaimer
My attorney says I really need to say this: The Technology Corner website is for informational purposes only. Neither Joe nor I assume any responsibility for its accuracy, although we do our best. The information is subject to change without notice. Any actions you take based on information from the radio program or from this website are entirely at your own risk. Products and services are mentioned for informational purposes only and their various trademarks and service marks are the property of their respective owners. Technology Corner cannot provide technical support for products or services mentioned on the air or on the website.

 

More or less live and in person

I've been invited to speak at the Columbus Computer Society's general session in December. The meeting begins at 6:30pm on Wednesday, December 15, at OCLC in Dublin. For more information, visit the CCS website.

The following week, I'll be victimizing the Licking County Computer society with the same talk at 7pm on the 21st of December. For information and directions, see the LCCS website.

I'll be talking about digital photography, video editing on your computer, advances in DVDs, browser battles and platform wars, and anything else that comes to mind.

 

[an error occurred while processing this directive]